FRONTLINEPRIVACY
Protection

DMV confidentiality election

A state-level filing that goes beyond the federal DPPA — it removes your home address from DMV records that would otherwise be released to qualified requesters under DPPA's permitted-use exceptions.

What this protection actually does

The federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA, 18 USC §§2721-2725) restricts what state DMVs can disclose. But it has 14 "permitted purposes" carve-outs that let government agencies, insurers, fraud-verification services, and licensed PIs pull DMV records without your consent.

A state DMV confidentiality election is a separate state-law filing that adds an extra layer on top of DPPA. It tells the DMV to flag your record as confidential — and depending on the state, it can either narrow the permitted-purpose carve-outs or seal the record entirely.

How to invoke

The mechanics vary widely. Some states (CA, TX, FL) have a standardized form. Others require an affidavit through your agency. The CA Vehicle Code §1808.4 election covers an enormous range of covered personnel — peace officers, judges, prosecutors, corrections, firefighters, federal LE — and lasts permanently for retired peace officers upon request.

What it doesn't reach

DMV confidentiality binds the DMV. It doesn't bind:

  1. DMV records that were already disclosed. If a broker pulled your DMV record under a permitted purpose before you elected confidentiality, the data is now downstream and out of DMV's control. DPPA gives you a private right of action for downstream misuse, but the data is loose.
  2. Vehicle registration data sold via commercial channels. Some commercial broker files include vehicle registration data that was sourced from leaks, breaches, or third-party aggregators that were never bound to DPPA permitted-purpose certification.
  3. License plate readers (ALPRs). ALPR systems capture your plate from public roads. The data flow there is governed by separate state statutes (and increasingly by litigation — see the 2025-2026 wave of ALPR lawsuits).

We sweep brokers continuously. The DMV election is the durable layer; broker removal is the active layer.

State-by-state coverage

Per-state protection level for dmv confidentiality. Tap any state for the full state guide.

Strong coverage (17)

Arizona

[Ariz. Rev. Stat. §28-454](https://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/00454.htm) — ADOT redaction for protected persons.

California

[Cal. Veh. Code §1808.4](https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-veh/division-2/chapter-1/article-3/section-1808-4/) — peace officers, judges, prosecutors, corrections, firefighters, federal LE. Permanent for retirees.

District of Columbia

[D.C. Code §50-1401.01b](https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/50-1401.01b) — release/use of personal info from motor vehicle records.

Florida

[F.S. §119.071(4)(d)2.a](https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0119/Sections/0119.071.html) — FLHSMV form HSMV 96020 for officers, judges, families.

Illinois

[15 ILCS 335/4(a-10)](https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=85&ChapterID=2&ChapNum=5&ActNum=140&SectionNum=7) — SOS confidentiality for public officials and peace officers.

Indiana

[Ind. Code §9-14-13-3](https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-9/article-14/chapter-13/section-9-14-13-3/) — BMV confidential records related to LE.

Iowa

[Iowa Admin. Code 761—Ch. 301](https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/iac/chapter/761.301.pdf) — DOT confidentiality for ACP participants.

Minnesota

[Minn. Stat. §171.12](https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/171.12) — DPS confidentiality.

Missouri

[Mo. Rev. Stat. §32.056](https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=32.056) — DOR confidentiality election.

Nebraska

[Neb. Rev. Stat. §§60-2901 to 60-2912](https://dmv.nebraska.gov/dvr/uniform-motor-vehicle-records-disclosure-act) — Uniform Motor Vehicle Records Disclosure Act.

Nevada

[NRS 481.091](https://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/chapter-481/statute-481-091/) — alternate address on driver license/ID for eligible persons.

New Jersey

[N.J.S.A. 39:2-3.4](https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/title-39/section-39-2-3-4/) — MVC confidentiality form for officers, judges, prosecutors.

Ohio

[Ohio Rev. Code §4501.271](https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-4501.271) — BMV confidentiality election.

Oregon

[ORS 802.250](https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_802.250) — eligible-public-employee residence-address shield.

Texas

[Tex. Govt. Code §552.130; Tex. Trans. Code Ch. 730](https://law.justia.com/codes/texas/government-code/title-5/subtitle-a/chapter-552/subchapter-c/section-552-130/) — DMV confidentiality election layered on DPPA.

Virginia

[Va. Code §46.2-208](https://law.justia.com/codes/virginia/title-46-2/chapter-2/section-46-2-208/) — DMV records confidentiality.

Washington

[RCW 40.24.030(4)](https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=40.24.030) — DOL confidentiality via ACP.

Moderate coverage (13)

Alaska

[AS 28.10.505; AS 28.10.071(c)](https://law.justia.com/codes/alaska/title-28/chapter-10/article-8/section-28-10-505/) — Confidentiality of Motor Vehicle Records.

Colorado

[Colo. Rev. Stat. §42-1-206](https://codes.findlaw.com/co/title-42-vehicles-and-traffic/co-rev-st-sect-42-1-206/) — DOR confidentiality, limited.

Connecticut

[Conn. Gen. Stat. §14-10](https://www.cga.ct.gov/2021/pub/chap_246.htm#sec_14-10) — DMV confidentiality, limited.

Delaware

[21 Del. C. §305](https://law.justia.com/codes/delaware/title-21/chapter-3/section-305/) — DMV privacy act.

Idaho

[Idaho Code §49-203](https://law.justia.com/codes/idaho/title-49/chapter-2/section-49-203/) — DMV records disclosure rules.

Kentucky

[KYTC Communication Designation](https://drive.ky.gov/Pages/CD.aspx) — DRIVE confidentiality program, limited.

Maine

[29-A M.R.S.A. §255](https://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/29-a/title29-Asec255.html) — DMV confidentiality for public safety.

Maryland

[Md. Comptroller 1506](https://www.marylandcomptroller.gov/about/field-enforcement-bureau/procedural-manual/1500/1506-confidential-registration.html) — confidential registration for limited categories.

New Hampshire

[N.H. RSA 260:14](https://law.justia.com/codes/new-hampshire/2023/title-xxi/chapter-260/section-260-14/) — DMV records disclosure restrictions.

North Carolina

[NCDOJ DPPA opinions](https://ncdoj.gov/opinions/drivers-privacy-protection-act/) — no specific state DMV officer-confidentiality, DPPA primary.

Oklahoma

[51 O.S. §24A.5(1)(c); 18 USC §2721](https://oklahoma.gov/BOT/newsroom/2022/personally-identifiable-data.html) — partial DMV confidentiality.

Rhode Island

[R.I. Gen. Laws §31-10.4-3](https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-31/chapter-31-10-4/section-31-10-4-3/) — DMV confidentiality, limited.

Tennessee

[Tenn. Code §55-25-107](https://law.justia.com/codes/tennessee/title-55/chapter-25/section-55-25-107/) — DDS disclosure-for-purposes statute.

Weak coverage (20)

Alabama

No state DMV confidentiality election identified, DPPA only.

Arkansas

No state DMV confidentiality election identified.

Georgia

[GA DDS Privacy Statement](https://dds.georgia.gov/organization/about-us/dds-privacy-statement) — no state DMV confidentiality election for officers identified.

Hawaii

[HI DOT Privacy Policy](https://hidot.hawaii.gov/highways/files/2022/06/PRIVACY-POLICY-STATEMENT-HAWAII-HDOT-DRAFT-FINAL-6-3-22.pdf) — no state DMV officer confidentiality, DPPA only.

Kansas

[K.S.A. 74-2012](https://ksrevisor.gov/statutes/chapters/ch74/074_020_0012.html) — Division of Vehicles records disclosure, no specific officer carve-out.

Louisiana

No state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.

Massachusetts

[Mass.gov RMV records](https://www.mass.gov/how-to/request-personal-information-in-rmv-records) — no state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.

Michigan

No state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.

Mississippi

[MS Title 35.VII.1.01 (DPPA)](https://www.dor.ms.gov/sites/default/files/motor-vehicle-services/mvl_disclosurepacket.pdf) — federal DPPA only.

Montana

[61-11-508 MCA](https://archive.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0610/chapter_0110/part_0050/section_0080/0610-0110-0050-0080.html) — permitted-disclosure statute, no specific officer carve-out.

New York

[NY DMV DPPA page](https://dmv.ny.gov/records/drivers-privacy-protection-act-dppa) — no state-specific officer DMV confidentiality, DPPA only.

North Dakota

[N.D.C.C. Title 39, Ch. 33](https://ndlegis.gov/cencode/t39c33.pdf) — DPPA-aligned, no specific officer carve-out.

Pennsylvania

No state-specific DMV confidentiality election for officers identified.

South Carolina

No state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.

South Dakota

[SDCL 32-5-147](https://sdlegislature.gov/Statutes/32-5-147) — no state-specific officer DMV confidentiality.

Utah

No state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.

Vermont

[VT DMV DPPA page](https://dmv.vermont.gov/enforcement-and-safety/driving-records-requests/driver-privacy-protection-act) — DPPA only, no state-specific officer carve-out.

West Virginia

[W.Va. Code §17A-2A](https://code.wvlegislature.gov/17A-2A/) — DMV records, no specific officer confidentiality.

Wisconsin

No state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.

Wyoming

No state-specific officer DMV confidentiality election identified.