FRONTLINEPRIVACY
Protection

Daniel's Law-style broker removal statute

A statute that lets covered persons demand data brokers and online publishers remove their home address and unpublished phone, with statutory damages if the broker fails to comply within a fixed window.

What this protection actually does

Most state and federal privacy laws bind agencies. Daniel's Law-style statutes bind data brokers. That's the difference. You send a written notice citing the statute, the broker has a fixed window (usually 10 business days) to remove your info, and if they fail to comply you have a private right of action with mandatory statutory damages.

New Jersey's Daniel's Law (NJSA §47:1B-1) was the original. After the 2020 attack on Judge Esther Salas's family, NJ passed it in 2021 with $1,000-per-violation damages. The 2023 amendments made the damages mandatory, added punitive damages for willful violations, and let covered persons assign their claim to a third party. That's how Atlas Data Privacy Corp. files batched suits on behalf of thousands of officers.

13 more jurisdictions have followed. Most cover only judges. NJ, FL, NE go broader to first responders. WV's version was struck down in 2025 (Jackson v. Whitepages, N.D. W.Va.) for lacking a notice requirement.

How it works in practice

The mechanics are mostly uniform across the 14 jurisdictions:

  1. Identify yourself as a covered person under the statute.
  2. List the address and phone to remove.
  3. Cite the state statute by section.
  4. Demand removal within the statutory window (10 business days in NJ).
  5. Send via email if the broker has a privacy contact. Send via certified mail to the registered agent if you want a paper trail.

If the broker complies, you're done (until they re-list you in 6 months). If they don't, you sue in state court for statutory damages plus attorney fees. NJ has produced the most case volume — 37+ consolidated civil actions in the District of New Jersey by late 2024.

State-by-state coverage

The 14 jurisdictions with active Daniel's Law-style statutes (as of April 2026):

  • Federal (Daniel Anderl Act, 2022) — federal judges and immediate family only. See /laws/lieu-act.
  • New Jersey (2021, expanded 2023) — broadest. See /laws/daniels-law.
  • Florida (2024) — judges, LEOs, court staff, firefighters, prosecutors, public defenders, certain state agency personnel, families.
  • Nebraska (2022) — judges, LEOs, Nebraska National Guard members.
  • Missouri (2023) — active, former, retired judges plus prosecuting and circuit attorneys.
  • Delaware (2023) — state judicial officers and families.
  • Maryland (2024) — current and retired state and federal judges, magistrates, court commissioners, families.
  • Georgia (2024) — state, county, municipal, federal judges plus spouses.
  • Hawaii (2024) — governor, legislators, judges, election employees, appointed officials, families.
  • New York (2024) — active and former judges and immediate families.
  • Oklahoma (2024) — active and retired state, municipal, county, tribal, federal judges plus immediate family.
  • Minnesota (2025) — active, senior, retired judges plus judicial branch employees and referees.
  • Wisconsin (2025) — current and former state judges, court commissioners, families.
  • West Virginia (2021) — held facially unconstitutional (Jackson v. Whitepages, N.D. W.Va. Aug. 2025). Legislature is expected to amend.

The 36 remaining states have no Daniel's Law-style statute. Some have proposed bills. Officers in those states use other levers: DPPA for DMV-sourced exposure, public-records exemptions for agency exposure, and broker opt-outs for everything else.

What it doesn't reach

Daniel's Law statutes bind in-state actors and brokers that "sell into" the state. They don't reach:

  1. Brokers operating offshore with no US nexus. The statute applies but enforcement runs through US courts, which can't reach a Russian broker.
  2. Federal court records (PACER). Federal law governs — Daniel's Law doesn't bind federal courts.
  3. Property records at the county level. Daniel's Law doesn't require county recorders to remove address info from deed transfers. Use the state's separate property-records redaction track.

We file Daniel's Law notices on your behalf in the 14 jurisdictions where they apply, and we sweep brokers continuously in every state. If a broker re-lists you 6 months later (some do), we re-notice them.

State-by-state coverage

Per-state protection level for daniel's law analog. Tap any state for the full state guide.

Moderate coverage (17)

California

[Cal. Civil Code §1798.99.80 et seq. (Delete Act)](https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB362/id/2814024) — applies to all consumers; 45-day window.

Colorado

[Colo. Rev. Stat. §18-9-313](https://law.justia.com/codes/colorado/title-18/article-9/part-3/section-18-9-313/) — peace officers, judges, prosecutors, firefighters, treble damages for willful.

Georgia

[Ga. Code §16-11-93](https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legislation/document/20252026/235564) — anti-doxxing applicable to any person; min $500 damages for economic injury.

Illinois

[740 ILCS 148/1; 5 ILCS 347/20](https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=4646&ChapterID=59) — Civil Liability for Doxing Act and Public Official Safety and Privacy Act. 72-hour window.

Indiana

[Ind. Code §35-45-2-1](https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-35/article-45/chapter-2/section-35-45-2-1/) — intimidation/anti-doxxing, applies to first responders, increased penalties for legislators.

Iowa

[Iowa Code §708.7A](https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=91&ba=sf35) — peace officers, corrections officers, immediate family.

Maryland

[Md. Code Cts. & Jud. Proc. §§3-2301 to 3-2304](https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2024RS/chapters_noln/Ch_415_sb0575T.pdf) — current/retired state/federal judges, magistrates, court commissioners, families. 72-hour window.

Montana

[Mont. SB 282 (2025)](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/05/montana-becomes-first-state-close-law-enforcement-data-broker-loophole) — closes LE data-broker loophole; broad data-broker restrictions.

Nevada

[NRS 41.1347](https://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/chapter-41/statute-41-1347/) — civil action for doxxing; LE included as covered persons. Damages plus fees.

Oklahoma

[21 O.S. §1176 (HB 1643)](https://legiscan.com/OK/text/HB1643/id/2372669) — peace officers, public officials, families. Misdemeanor penalties.

Oregon

[ORS 30.835](https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_30.835) — civil action for improper disclosure of private info; economic, noneconomic, and punitive damages.

Rhode Island

[R.I. Gen. Laws §8-15-12](https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE8/8-15/8-15-12.htm) — Judicial Security Act for judges and immediate family. 10-day broker window, 72 hours for agencies.

South Dakota

[SD HB 1298 (2026)](https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/27282/304625) — LE officers, judges. Reactive electronic-publishing prohibition.

Utah

[Utah Code §53-18-103](https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title53/Chapter18/53-18-S103.html) — public-safety employees.

Virginia

[Va. Code §18.2-186.4:1](https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter6/section18.2-186.4:1/) — public officials petition circuit court to prohibit internet publication.

Washington

[RCW 4.24.792](https://app.leg.wa.gov/Rcw/default.aspx?cite=4.24.792) — civil action for non-consensual disclosure; $5,000/violation.

Wisconsin

[Wis. Stat. §757.07; 2023 Wis. Act 235](https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/2023/235) — current/former state judges, court commissioners, families.