Privacy for legal system
Judges, prosecutors, defenders, court staff.
Run a free scan. No signup.Why this matters more for you
The legal system creates threats by design. Every ruling produces someone who feels personally wronged. Every prosecution leaves a defendant with a long memory. Every public defender ends up representing people whose victims hold a grudge against everyone in the system, including the defender.
The 2020 attack on Judge Esther Salas's family, which killed her son Daniel, is the case that produced Daniel's Law in NJ — a state statute that lets covered judges, prosecutors, and officers sue data brokers for failing to remove their home address — and the federal Lieu Act for federal judges. The mechanics — broker page → home address → physical attack — are the same across the legal-system roles.
What's actually exposed
Run a scan and the typical legal-professional profile shows up: name, current address, prior addresses, spouse, parents, kids' names. For judges, sometimes the bar admission record. For prosecutors, sometimes the case-history record. All scraped, all on broker pages.
What law does for you
Federal judges have the Lieu Act — the strongest legal tool you can use. Enroll through the AOUSC and the federal pipeline files batched removal demands across major brokers.
State court judges, prosecutors, and defenders have varying levels of state protection. NJ's Daniel's Law covers judges and prosecutors. IL's Judicial Privacy Act covers judges only. Other states have weaker tools or none at all.
What we do
Continuous sweeping of 200+ broker sites. We operate alongside the federal Lieu Act pipeline for federal judges and alongside state broker-removal statutes where they apply. We sweep the family the same way.
If your court or your bar association wants to cover staff or members at scale, we do that.